Hype, Spin And Restrictions On Freedom Of Information

This page is about Spin, the deliberate withholding of information and other misleading  hype and propaganda about New Zealand.

This can range from myths perpetuated by  ‘100% pure’ slogans to ‘least corrupt country in the world’ statements, to significant restriction on the type and nature of information that is released to the public. Click on the links to read the full story at source:

  • New Zealand is often described as the most peaceful country in the world, however it is still legal to deploy NZ troops overseas on illegal missions. The Non-Aggression and Lawful Use of Force Bill was defeated in parliament on its first reading in June 2009. If successful the bill would have introduced legislation that “required NZ leaders, when requested by another country for armed assistance in foreign military operations, to seek a finding from the New Zealand Attorney-General whether the operation was in conformity with the United Nations Charter. [The UN Charter prohibits initiation of armed action for any reason other than immediate self-defence] before deciding on such a request. A special prosecutor’s office would have been created to investigate and possibly pursue charges that such a decision violated the United Nations Charter.” Scoop Sept 2009
  • New Zealand is a target for arms traders. The Oxfam report Brokers Without Borders “holds New Zealand up as an example of how illicit arms brokers continue to use international networks of companies to exploit regulatory gaps, when detailing an incident last December when a 35-tonne cache of conventional weapons, which left North Korea bound for Iran, was seized by authorities in Thailand…All of a sudden New Zealand, the country ranked as the world’s most peaceful nation in 2009, was linked to one of the biggest international arms trafficking cases that year,” the report says.”
  • Ministers are ignoring the Official Information Act, according to a No Right Turn press release. “Only one Minister, Chris Finlayson, met (the standard). Most fell far below it, with four making timely responses in only 50% of cases. The worst-performing Minister was Gerry Brownlee, who answered only 39.7% of requests within the statutory timelines set by the Act. Overall, across all Ministers, only 71% of requests were answered on time.  One Minister, Paula Bennett, refused to cooperate with the survey, saying that she did not consider release of accurate tracking data to be in the public interest. Her refusal is currently the subject of a complaint to the Ombudsmen…The difference between Ministerial offices and government departments is significant,” said Idiot/Savant. “It shows that the problem is political. Ministers just don’t want to answer.” Source
  • The bill was only passed after two members switched sides in protest at the PM ordering them to vote against it. It was passed by 20 votes to 18. Both sides tried to claim credit for the bill and sought women’s votes accordingly. But women weren’t given full sufferage and allowed to stand for office until 1919 and they were not eligible to be appointed to the New Zealand Legislative Council (the Upper House of Parliament) until 1941.
  • Women were able to vote in 1838 in the Pitcairns and in South Australia in 1861, long before their New Zealand sisters. Places with similar status which granted women the vote include Wyoming Territory (1869). South Australia went on to grant both universal suffrage and  allowed women to stand for the colonial parliament in 1895, long before NZ did the same. In 1906 (7 years before NZ) Finland was the first NATION in the world to grant suffrage (the right to vote and to run for office) to all citizens, including women.  Other possible contenders for first “country” to grant female suffrage include the Corsican Republic, the Isle of Man (1881) and Franceville.
  • Despite a lot of hype about made about women’s rights and equality in NZ, women are still required to sit behind the men at Maori ceremonies.
  • Far from being the progressive country it tries to portray, NZ is letting Women Rights slide backwards. See Here for more details.
  • NZ did not invent the bungee/bungy  jump. By and large the first time the modern world saw the jump was in the 1950s when British film maker David Attenborough brought back footage of people jumping from wooden platforms in Vanuatu with vines tied to their feet. The first  modern bungee jumps were made on 1 April 1979 from the 250-foot Clifton Suspension Bridge in Bristol, UK by David Kirke, Chris Baker, Simon Keeling, Tim Hunt and Alan Weston of the Oxford University Dangerous Sports Club. Kiwis, however, were the first to turn bungee into a commercial enterprise.
      In the National Athem -”

God Defend New Zealand

      ” -

He

      is implored to “defend” and “bless” the free land.

A prayer is also said at the start of each day in Parliament

      : “

Almighty God, humbly acknowledging our need for Thy guidance in all things, and laying aside all private and personal interests, we beseech Thee to grant that we may conduct the affairs of this House and of our country to the glory of Thy holy name, the maintenance of true religion and justice, the honour of the Queen, and the public welfare, peace, and tranquillity of New Zealand, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen

    .”
  1. Cramped Cuddles
    April 1, 2011 at 9:52 am | #1

    Some of us, I am sure, have noticed not only how criticism of New Zealand is shouted down or deleted on many expat or travel forums, but also how quickly negative reviews of “anything New Zealand” are taken down off the web, if this can be managed. This author below was probably offered a discount flight or two to take her review down. This is a cached version of a customer review (on the Art of Health blog), of Air NZ’s new mega-hyped premium economy air service, it was completely deleted within a matter of days, so I am putting it on here for the record…in fact, you could have a section on your blog, “Gone Tomorrow”, about articles mysteriously taken off the web (dug up cached versions). ;)

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:YS4NHxfpWiUJ:kimknight101.wordpress.com/2011/03/26/new-air-new-zealand-777-300-new-meaning-to-sardines-in-a-tin-can/+new-air-new-zealand-777-300-new-meaning-to-sardines-in-a-tin-can/&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&source=www.google.com

    New Air New Zealand 777-300 – new meaning to sardines in a tin can

    Posted on March 26, 2011. Filed under: Uncategorized |

    As a seasoned traveler, and a great fan of comfort, I was eager to test out Air New Zealand’s brand new premium economy and ‘cuddle class for two’ economy seating at their open day in Auckland yesterday. And let me say, if I ever have an opportunity to rave about a hotel or airline, I will do so openly and with pleasure. I’d also like to add, in the light of the recent traumatic world events, that rating the quality and comfort of an airline’s seating is quite inconsequential. ***However, after all of Air New Zealand’s hype about their new seating, I think people deserve to hear an opinion which doesn’t come via their own PR department***.

    CUDDLE CLASS – LIE FLAT OPTION IN ECONOMY

    First of all, the new ‘lie down for two’ seating in economy class, colloquially known as ‘cuddle class’. I have to say, for one person, this option would be wonderful. Somewhat smaller than the width of a single bed, it was plenty wide for one person, and very comfortable. However, as I squeezed myself in with a friend, both of us lying sideways like a club sandwich, there was little room left to breath. This would not be a comfortable option for two adults on a long-haul flight.

    Perhaps what concerned me even more was sitting in the row behind any economy seating when the seats are in the lean back position. I don’t think I’ve ever felt more wedged in and unable to move in an economy seat. I cannot even begin to imagine lasting more than an hour, never mind 12 hours on a long flight. It seems to me that their long-haul economy seating has less room than the smaller planes used for national flights. So, apart from booking a complete cuddle class to myself, economy gets a thumbs down.

    PREMIUM ECONOMY – A STEP UP FROM ECONOMY? DOUBTFUL…

    Then it was on into the much talked about new premium economy class. Apart from the new shiny white leather seating, there was nothing impressive about these seats. The aisle seats are designed for solo travelers, so they have a sense of ‘personal space’. In order to achieve this, the seats have been set at an angle, which from a feng shui perspective just feels all over the place. There’s something not quite right about sitting at 45° when one is moving straight forwards. In particular, apart from the first row in the cabin, I was shocked at the leg room between rows, only a midget or child would have enough space for their legs. And the ‘pull forward, tilt back’ function of the seat, which apparently supports the lower back, felt very uncomfortable. Overall I felt completely claustrophobic and couldn’t wait to get out of premium economy.

    BUSINESS CLASS – LIE FLAT

    I’ve often eyed-up the lie flat business seats, so I was eager to finally try them out. Being very sensitive to the feng shui (energetic flow and layout of space) the oblique angle, as in premium economy, just didn’t feel quite right. Despite the fact that the beds are lie flat, and quite comfy, they are not a patch on the business class of other airlines such as Thai, Singapore or British Airways). I will always be grateful for any opportunity to lie down flat on a long flight, and this would be no exception. However, the cubicles are not overly large and the overall feeling in the cabin was cramped. Partly I think this was also due to the very narrow aisle.

    So, after looking forward to the tour of the new aircraft, I came away feeling most disappointed, to the point that Air New Zealand’s promotion – in particular for premium economy – could be considered false advertising! I’m sorry Air New Zealand, I have been a great fan of your airline for many years, but I am simply shocked at how stacking people in like sardines in a tin can passes for quality in this day and age.

  2. pilotmb
    April 4, 2011 at 10:20 pm | #2

    Speaking of aircraft, Air NZ has many Boeing 737s, a model that is in the news at this time as showing microcracks. It is improbable in view of their budgetary restrictions that NZ would perform what are called “heavy checks” that would forestall an incident like the one in whose wake inspections are presently being carried out in the U.S.

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 46 other followers